– “Freedom of speech is a principal pillar of a free government; when this support is taken away, the constitution of a free society is dissolved, and tyranny is erected on its ruins. Republics and limited monarchies derive their strength and vigor from a popular examination into the action of the magistrates.” – Benjamin Franklin, “On Freedom of Speech and the Press”, Pennsylvania Gazette, 17 November 1737
– “Better a thousandfold abuse of free speech than denial of free speech. The abuse dies in a day; the denial slays the life of the people and entombs the hope of the race.” – Charles Bradlaugh, Speech at Hall of Science c.1880 quoted in An Autobiography of Annie Besant; reported in Edmund Fuller, Thesaurus of Quotations (1941), p. 398
– “If there is a bedrock principle of the First Amendment, it is that the government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable.” – Justice William J. Brennan, Jr., Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989).
– “What is freedom of expression? Without the freedom to offend, it ceases to exist.” – Salman Rushdie, In Good Faith (1990), p. 6.
Friends, I cite the above quotes about free speech, because that’s what the crux of Laura Ingraham’s ‘The Ingraham Angle’ focused on last night, her first day back on the job after a break with her kids.
I’ll also say that there once was a time in this country, during the 60s and into the mid 70s, when – believe it or not – the left were the staunchest defenders and supporters of the 1st Amendment – even in libo academia. They actually welcomed and encouraged opposing views, even if those views were considered “racist,” “hateful,” or “offensive.” If a conservo or “right-wing” guest speaker was at a libo college, there were no riots or acts of violence and intimidation. There was no ‘shouting down’ of the speaker. They respectfully let him/her speak. The attendees were then allowed to counter what the speaker said in a civil, organized manner. In other words, there was civil discourse – as it should be.
But sometime during the past half-century plus, the left became “offended” by opposing viewpoints. They became thin-skinned pussies (for lack of a better term). They became anti-American and embraced Hitleresque socialism, attempting to stifle any speech that runs counter to their totalitarian ideologies. Colleges and universities became indoctrination camps instead of institutions of higher education.
Anyway, for those that missed Laura’s show last night, she opened by discussing the book “Illiberal Education,” published in 1991 by Dinesh D’Souza, and how it described liberal colleges going from “championing free speech to stifling it.”
“I have been the victim of a boycott,” Ingraham said. “It is wrong. You shouldn’t do this by team. It is the modern way of cutting off free speech.”
“And the goal posts by the way are forever moving. Every day more issues are taken off the table all together and may no longer be debated at all,” she continued. “So, in other words, if you are against affirmative action. You are a racist. And if you wear a ‘Make America Great Again’ hat to a gun control rally and get beaten up, well, don’t expect a lot of sympathy from the attendees. And if you praise the military skill of Robert E. Lee, you are liable to be branded a defender of slavery in The New York Times.”
Laura also made no apologies during last night’s show, and she didn’t need to. Frankly, I feel she shouldn’t have apologized the first time to that pencil-necked, pussy, radical crisis actor ‘Nazi’, David Hoggshit! If I ever had the ‘pleasure’ of coming in contact with him, I’d bust his commie yap with my cane. Hell, it would be worth it to post a $50 or $100 bail bond to give the little fuck even temporary ‘lockjaw’!
Anyway, Laura tackled the “Stalinist” actions of the left who appear to want nothing more than to issue a gag order on free speech.
“The left’s propaganda shaped a new generation of young adults,” Ingraham said.
She said that “safe spaces” and terms like “white privilege” have been used to “intimidate those who disagree” with the left.
Despite all the left’s talk of inclusivity, Ingraham said that they “don’t invite more voices to enter public discussion.”
“Generations later, the chilling effect on free speech and the workplace in the media, and in society at large is palpable,” Ingraham explained, noting that circumstances may even be worsening.
Ingraham went on in what appeared to be a direct jab at the boycotts spawned by Hoggshit’s demands, noting that expressing your opinions in today’s day and age can get you fired.
“Or, yes, you can get boycotted,” she added.
She went on to illustrate her point by bringing up 2016 incidents in which Trump supporters were assaulted (see below, remember them?)
Black Trump Supporter Accosted by Black Lives Matter Protesters…of course, he’s just an “Uncle Tom” to the leftist, privileged whites
Where was the outcry from the leftards , especially the ‘March for Women’ people when this woman – and others, were assaulted by the anti-Trumpers? Many women were even sexually assaulted! Yet…not a peep from the hypocrites of the left!
Liberal violence against Trump supporters during the 2016 campaign
The new DemoRATS show their hate for America!
“This is the intolerant left in action,” Ingraham declared. “Whether it’s striking voices from social media, or driving certain viewpoints from the airwaves. Beating people up, organizing boycotts for perceived unforgivable offenses, or preventing speakers from being heard on a college campus, it’s all coming from the same place: a desperate desire to stop debate by branding your opponent unacceptable and driving him or her from the public square.”
“Their efforts are Stalinist, pure and simple,” she later added. “Their objective is a total transformation of American society, not through rational discourse and open debate, but through personal demonization and silencing.”
Ingraham went on to issue a dire warning for even those who don’t consider themselves conservatives.
“True liberals and conservatives should defend the free speech anywhere and everywhere because the tables can turn quickly,” Ingraham said. “Today it’s conservatives being targeted. Tomorrow it could be left of center voices as well.”
Lastly, Laura closed her show by announcing a new segment called “Defending the First,” a recurring feature which she said will “expose the enemies of the First Amendment, of free expression, and every thought, while showcasing those brave voices making a difference.”
“If you have been subjected to threats or intimidation because of your speech, I want to know about it,” Ingraham said. “Tweet me, because without free speech and a free conscience, we are not truly a free people.”
Amen to that, Laura! We conservos will NOT be silenced, or be idle any longer while the ‘Nazis’ of the left continue to dismantle our freedoms one-by-one. They start with the 1st and 2nd Amendments, and where will it end? The answer lies in Hitler’s Germany!
Friends, I’m sure y’all have heard by now about gun control radical David Hogg launching a campaign to try and get Fox News host Laura Ingraham booted from her show simply because she noted that he was rejected from multiple colleges.
I mean, hell, the fact that this illiterate libtard shill was the one that initially posted tweets about his numerous college rejections, looking for sympathy from his leftie supporters, and the fact that Laura was simply repeating what he posted, and suddenly she’s the ‘bad gal’?
This little punk gets his widdo feewings hurt, so he has to – once again – have his emotional juvenile outburst by attacking Laura Ingraham, on her show, “The Ingraham Angle,” because she hurt his feelings by tweeting about his college rejections – a fact he openly declared himself.
This sorry little commie bastard is gonna learn (one way or the other), that he can’t continue to use his age as a crutch to verbally attack others, and expect them to not fight back. He’s living in the quintessential libtard utopia where he believes he can continue his attacks with impunity, and when those he attacks do strike back – he and his leftist pals want to cry “Foul!”?
Uhhh…I think not.
Hoggshit has continued his hate-filled rampage, refusing to accept Ingraham’s apology unless she gave in to more of his demands.
Who the fuck does this little twerp think he is making “demands”! Hey…Hoggshit, howz bout I make a ‘demand’ that ya get your fucking smug face bashed in!
But not to worry, my friends. You see, we conservos aren’t allowing Hogg to get away with bullying Ingraham considering he’s been a bully himself to everyone who doesn’t share his views on the Second Amendment.
Those 11 companies who pulled ads had better watch out. As evidenced by the following recent tweets:
And these are just the tip of the proverbial iceberg, friends.
And, soon-to-be nationally syndicated radio host Ben Shapiro has also had enough of fucktard David Hogg.
As Shapiro sees it, the kid should not be allowed to get away with attacking everyone who disagrees with him on guns while whining when he’s attacked by others.
Shapiro laid out his own demands for Hogg, telling him he should apologize to numerous people.
Check it out…
From BizPac Review:
Daily Wire editor-in-chief Ben Shapiro called out the student gun control activist for pressuring advertisers into dropping conservative Laura Ingraham over a dig at his self-admitted college acceptance difficulties. On Twitter, Shapiro challenged Hogg to apologize to public figures whom he has maligned.
I guarantee y’all that if a 17-yr old conservo, pro-gun kid was going around verbally attacking libos the way Hoggshit is, his age wouldn’t even be an issue with our libo friends.
BizPac also reported:
Social media users tired of seeing Hogg, hearing Hogg or being lectured by Hogg, launched a campaign to “make him go away.”
The hashtags #BlockTheHogg and #Hogwash began to appear on Twitter as a collective venting unfolded against the 17-year-old who has been the face of the left’s anti-gun narrative following the Florida school shooting.
The bottom line is, Hoggshit overstepped himself when he went and called for a boycott of Fox News host host Laura Ingraham, not for anything that had to do with guns.
And, although that may have been Hogg’s motivation there was something “very dark and sinister” behind it, as conservo commentator and writer, Candace Owens, observed.
“No ‘kid’ thinks up mercilessly going after someone’s advertisers because they called him ‘whiny,’” she tweeted.
And she’s right, Hogg has been getting the advice and help of Media Matters who admitted they want to shut down another Fox host. They’ve conducted similar boycott campaigns in the past against Fox hosts. They’re just using Hogg as a vehicle to shut down political speech with which they disagree – just as all despots do, and have done in the past.
“Sieg Heil”, right, libos.
But as I said, now conservos have launched a counter-boycott, with the hashtag #IStandwithLaura, against any of the advertisers if they pull out of Ingraham’s show.
And even CNN is now questioning Hogg and what he is about. In an interview with him, CNN’s Ana Cabrera confronted him and said some considered him a bully. That didn’t make him happy and he refused delivery, saying he didn’t agree with that.
Awww…he got his feewings hurt by CNN. Of course, don’t look for him to “demand” a boycott of their advertisers, since his mumsie-poo works there.
When even CNN is starting to question him, his time in the media sun may be coming to an end.
Lastly, Laura will be back tonight at her regular scheduled time, despite Hoggshit’s little stunt.
Fox decided to very publicly stand by her.
This is partly because 21st Century Fox patriarch Rupert Murdoch doesn’t want his channel to give in to endless boycott campaigns. Vanity Fair reported that Murdoch instructed Fox News co-president Jack Abernethy to issue a supportive statement after the boycott picked up steam. “Sources say Murdoch has told people that Fox’s current management has been too quick to cave to the network’s many critics,” Vanity Fair’s Gabriel Sherman wrote.
Abernethy’s statement last Monday quashed talk about whether the ad boycott would make her vacation permanent.
“We cannot and will not allow voices to be censored by agenda-driven intimidation efforts,” he said. “We look forward to having Laura Ingraham back hosting her program next Monday when she returns from spring vacation with her children.”
In situations like this, some advertisers simply shift their ads to other shows on the network.
Friends, as I mentioned here a while back, prior to the Parkland shooting, I owned two guns; a .12 ga pump shotgun and a .40-cal Glock semi-auto pistol (shown below).
Now, I had always wanted an AR-15, as well as a smaller handgun, as the latter would be much more easier and comfortable to carry concealed (and yes, I do have a valid Fla. concealed firearm license), than the Glock.
“But why an AR-15,” I’d ask myself. After all, I no longer live close to the Everglades like when I lived in south Fla. With my health problems, I wouldn’t go out to the ‘Glades anymore anyway. Ditto why I don’t hunt anymore. Sure, once in a great while some pesky critter may find it’s way into my backyard from the canal behind my home, but I either just throw a rock at it, yell at it, or if that fails, use my Glock. I sure as hell ain’t gonna use an AR on a critter no larger than my Chorkie dog, Sammy.
Frankly, I wanted an AR-15 because, well…I would enjoy shooting it at one of the many indoor gun ranges here. It’s relaxing for me. You know, like maybe a few rounds of golf, walking on the beach, or taking a dip in the ocean or a pool is relaxing to some. But, would that be worth spending anywhere from $800-$1100 for an AR?
I then realized, that the AR-15 variants are the ideal general-purpose rifles – fairly affordable, practical, customizable, lightweight, accurate, low-recoil, easy to shoot – and ammo is universally available and cheap thanks to its high-volume military production.
However, I still procrastinated on buying one.
That is, until after the Parkland shooting, and a professional libtard, punk activist with a far-left agenda named David Hogg reared his ugly mug, and began spewing his bullshit that includes repealing the 2nd Amendment, neutering the 1st Amendment, and creating an environment making Parkland shootings more likely, not less.
There is a reason why tens of millions of Americans choose to own a good semi-auto rifle, and why the moment it seems likely we might be forbidden to buy one, hundreds of thousands of us rushed out to the gun stores and various gun shows to buy one…or two…or three…or more!
And, that’s precisely the reason I went out to buy my AR-15, as well as a .44 magnum derringer (shown below). And, as I also mentioned here before – I plan on buying more.
All thanks to ‘Boss Hogg’ & Co, and his anti-gun campaign – as well as the adult anti-gunners.
And, I’m not alone here, either.
After the Parkland shooting, not only did membership – and donations, skyrocket in the NRA, but Florida went on a gun shopping spree!
The FBI’s National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS), a barometer for gun purchases, shows that in February checks for sales in Florida were up 3.5 percent year over year. There was a 12.6 percent increase in long guns, a category that includes AR’s. Nationwide, long-gun checks were up 3 percent.
Also in February, 2.3 million NICS checks were run nationwide for events including sales of long guns and hand guns, other weapons and components, and license renewals.
Beyond Florida, 18 other states saw gun sales go up, including those in which politicians were debating state-level firearms regulation.
“February’s uptick, particularly with respect to long guns, is yet another example of the historical trend following the re-ignition of the gun control debate,” analyst James Hardiman of Wedbush wrote in a note.
Had Hogg and his leftist cronies just STFU, gun sales (including sales of AR’s), along with NRA m’ships and donations would have – at best – remained stagnant. I would still have had only my shotgun and Glock.
Of course, add to this anti-gun rhetoric by the leftists, the fact that they simply can’t be honest, as well as report all other news involving guns and shootings. They always go for the ‘fake news’ bullshit. Trying to feed the American public ‘shit’ and convince us it’s ‘ice cream’!
Hell, just a few months before Parkland, an attacker with an AR-15 type rifle shot up a church – 26 people killed, including 6 children ranging from 17 months to 16 years old – yet calls for banning guns were muted at best by the leftist MSM. Why? Uhhh…perhaps because the hero, a civilian NRA instructor, used his own AR-15 rifle to end the massacre before police could arrive, then followed and cornered the attacker. And because the attacker was only free to buy guns because the Air Force failed to report his domestic abuse violations. A tale of government negligence, and an armed civilian to the rescue. Gee, not exactly the “narrative” about the “terrorist NRA,” “inadequate gun laws,” and “evil black rifles” the left was looking for, huh?
And, as we all know by now, including the leftists (and ‘Boss Hogg’), they refuse to admit that the Parkland massacre exposes an almost unbelievable level of incompetence and even cowardice at every level of law enforcement from the FBI (where Hogg’s daddy worked), down to the Broward ‘Coward’ sheriff’s dept. All the warning signs were ignored, and an armed officer already on the scene, who might have cut the massacre short, didn’t act. Existing laws were entirely adequate to prevent both of these shootings, but failed due to negligence.
So, why can’t Hogg &Co., the MSM, and the leftists at large concede this fact? As I mentioned here also, if they had – or would, at least I wouldn’t hammer ’em so hard, and I might even have some modicum of respect for ’em if for no other reason than their being…HONEST!
Leftist pols, and the MSM are using Parkland students as their shills to try to spin the cause as a lack of enough gun control, with the “bloodthirsty” but “all-powerful” NRA as the scapegoat. And as always, the pre-ordained response is yet another attempt to ban the favorite rifles of tens of millions of law-abiding gun owners. A whacked-out loony fuck just happened to use the most popular type of rifle in America when he went on his rampage – so hey, let’s take away everyone’s right to own the most effective tools available for defending home, family, and community. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense, huh?
– More people are killed every year with blunt objects, or are simply beaten to death, than are murdered using “assault” rifles.
– Only about 3-4% of murders using firearms (out of about 11,000 annually) in the US involve rifles (including bolt & lever action rifles, .22LR and semi-automatic rifles of all types). A person’s chances of being murdered with an “assault” rifle in any given year are literally about one in a million.
– The average number of people killed per year in all types of public mass shootings (3+ killed, not including shooter) over the last 38 years was 25. Fewer than 1/3 of these were killed using semi-automatic rifles. The average number of people wounded per year was 35.
– The average number of people killed at schools in mass (3+ killed) school shootings, adult and child, over the same 38-year period was 4 per year, or roughly 1 in ten million. Meanwhile 815 students die annually and 152,250 are injured during regular travel between school and home
– In the four major school shootings (Columbine, Virginia Tech, Newtown, Parkland) over the past 38 years in which 10 or more people were killed, 45 people were killed and 47 wounded using pistols, while 44 were killed and 16 wounded with “assault” rifles. At Virginia Tech, the most deadly, 32 were killed with pistols. The Parkland shooter used only 10-round magazines.
– In an average year 4 to 5 times more people are knifed to death, 30 times more people are killed by drunken drivers and 200 times more die from drug overdoses than are killed with “assault” rifles.
So, my friends, these verifiable facts beg the following questions; is safety really the issue, where are the marches and rallies and posters to fight drug trafficking? Why aren’t we working to bring back Prohibition? How about requiring safer school buses with automatic braking and seat belts? Far more children would be saved. Why instead the near hysterical drive to blame the NRA and ban semi-auto rifles?
But see, this calculated push to ban semi-auto firearms in a fit of emotion is not really about safety. The true purpose is to advance the left’s longstanding desire to disarm the American people. Parkland is just the latest excuse, and the radical kids you see on the news, carefully selected to exclude contrary viewpoints, are just the latest useful idiots.
Most of us still believe in being prepared to take care of ourselves if things go badly wrong, not to mention being ready to fight for our freedom if the day ever comes when our political system devolves toward dictatorship. And disarming the citizenry is one of the key steps down that path. Watching Venezuelan socialists outlaw the sale of private firearms and ammo in 2012, then declare they would hand out hundreds of thousands of AK-47 rifles to their own followers in 2017, should be a sufficiently cautionary tale for anyone who values freedom!
Lastly, my friends, banning guns does not lead to safety, it leads to helplessness. Rights not backed up with the ability to defend them are really just permissions, dependent entirely on the willingness and ability of the authorities to enforce them. Such willingness and ability is not guaranteed. If you doubt it, study the legalized persecution of unarmed blacks in the Jim Crow era. Genuinely free people must have the right to be armed with weapons sufficient to defend their freedom.
From what I understand, my friends, the phrase “everyone will be world-famous for 15 minutes” is credited to either Andy Warhol or his photographer, Nat Finkelstein (1966 or 1968). No matter, whoever said it first, it has indeed turned out to be true when it comes to persons who are suddenly slingshot into a media firestorm for one reason or another. Soon enough, our 24-hour news cycle moves on to the next cultural or political phenomenon, whether it’s legitimate or entirely fake.
And, we forget these people the minute they disappear – like a fart in the wind – from our tv or internet screens. And, we’ll quickly forget Stormy Daniels and David Hogg, too, and the sooner, the better. Let the next firestorm begin! This one began to stink a few weeks ago.
You see, friends, the lefties in America increasingly swaddles itself in bubble wrap. These loony progressives, don’t intend to let the values of mainstream Americans interfere with their agenda to transform our nation. When an event like the school shooting in Parkland occurs, they’re quick to leap into action. They seem to have an uncanny ‘ability’ to know within minutes whom to blame, whom to catapult into the media spotlight, where to get the money to fund whatever campaign they spring into action to mount. Like the devout students of Saul Alinsky they are, they know how to capitalize on a crime and misery.
I mean, let’s be honest here, huh…the leftist media believed that as the Russia collusion meme fell apart, they could take Trump out with a porn star. Is she really a “star”? Hell, who knows? No one really gives a shit, except the powers that be at CNN. The Access Hollywood tape from years ago didn’t hurt Trump one bit, but somehow, in their dreams, a one-night stand 12-years ago with the “porn actress” will do the trick.
For weeks, CNN and MSNBC have gone all in on this asinine story. Their reporting on Benghazi was nothing compared to their coverage of this particular brief encounter. They have ignored entirely the volumes of proof that the Clinton campaign, the DNC, the media, the FBI, and the CIA colluded in a wholly illegal, unconstitutional way to take Trump down and out both before and after the election. But hey, they don’t want to know about that.
But you see, children – of all ages – prefer liberalism. They can then stick their fingers in their ears when facts they don’t like might be become audible. Their fingers are still in their ears.
The loathsome ‘Nazi’ David Hogg and the pitiful ‘slut star’ Stormy Daniels are each sad commentaries on our 15-minutes-of fame culture. The saddest aspect of their brushes with celebrity is their own apparent belief that these events are meaningful. They’re not – not one bit! They’re both this month’s media instruments of rage and ratings. Nothing Hogg has to say is based on truth or facts! And, whatever is true or not true re: Daniels’s accusations is of no interest to anyone but voyeurs like Anderson Cooper.
My friends, the truth of the matter is, both Hogg and Daniels are about to be old news. You see, sooner or later, the left and the MSM will realize that these two minions are doing more harm than good to their anti-Trump agenda. The president’s approval ratings have gone up over the past few weeks, and donations to the NRA have notably increased during CNN’s intense focus on Hogg and Daniels. (Uh-oh…)
This past Tuesday, a new report revealed that donations to the NRA political action committee significantly increased in February after they were attacked by the media and far-left activists in the wake of the Parkland shooting.
“The PAC raised a total of $779,063 in February and reported $247,985 in donations in January,” an increase of over 300%, The Washington Free Beacon reported.
It went on to state:
The massive surge in donations comes after the gun rights group has been viciously attacked by the media and far-left activists like Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School student David Hogg, who has referred to the NRA as “child murderers” on multiple occasions.
Lastly, I came across an article that proposed thought experiment for our libo friends: What if the Parkland students – and the hundreds of thousands of other fired up adolescents who gathered around the nation last weekend – were not on your team? What if, rather than advocating in favor of something you passionately agree with, they were advocating in favor of something you passionately disagree with? Say, for example, their voices were raised not for the purpose of restricting access to guns, but for the purpose of restricting access to abortion?
So, for example, instead of seeing a 16-year-old on a podium in front of an enthusiastic throng thundering that “any politician who receives a dollar from the NRA has blood on his hands,” it would be “any politician who receives a dollar from Planned Parenthood has blood on his hands.”
Or, during the CNN “town hall” ambush of Marco Rubio and NRA spokesperson Dana Loesch, suppose it were, instead, Chuck Schumer (100% rating from Planned Parenthood) and Cecile Richards, who, during her tenure as President of Planned Parenthood, presided over millions of abortions. Suppose teenager Cameron Kasky, instead of walking up to Sen. Marco Rubio; getting in his face; and saying, as he did, “Senator Rubio, it’s hard to look at you and not look down the barrel on an AR-15 and not look at Nikolas Cruz,” said to Sen. Chuck Schumer, “Senator Schumer, it’s hard to look at you and not see an aborted fetus and body parts being sold on the open market”? Suppose it were Richards who was the target of shouts of “murderer,” “burn her” and “cunt” instead of Loesch?
But you see, those on the left will not engage in this thought experiment, because the exploitation of these wide-eyed, predictably passionate, predictably naïve, and predictably full of themselves young people is just too delicious, too effective, too useful. That it is tawdry and exploitative and shameful is of no concern, outweighed by the import they perceive the ascendancy of their views to have. Without doubt as to the rectitude of their worldview, convinced of the wickedness of any opposition, the end is justified, even placing children at the point of their phalanx, something that in a different world, and perhaps a better world, would be understood as an act of cowardice.
Y’all remember Cindy Sheehan?
Well, she, too, was a darling of the left (well, for a time, anyway). She was said by them to have “absolute moral authority” based upon the loss of her son, Casey, in Iraq – the same immunization from criticism bestowed upon the Parkland students. She was used as a cudgel by the left against the policies – and, even more importantly, the morality – of the Bush administration. She too led rallies, marched, spoke, and even camped out at the Bush compound in Texas – and every second of it was covered with relish, and gusto, and with fanfare by the MSM, endlessly. Then she made a misstep: she said something that was counter to the agenda, contrary to the approved narrative. She implicated Hillary Clinton, essentially putting her in the same basket of culpability as George Bush. The result? She disappeared from the media, instantly and forever, except, for a short time, as the target of a ferocious campaign of delegitimization by a media that had loved her so just such a short time prior.
Hence, her ’15-minutes’ had expired…and, so is Hogg’s.
Someone should say to Hogg and his ilk: You are being used. If that’s OK with you, fine. But know that’s what it is. And know that sometime down the road, it is going to end, and you are going to be discarded! At that point, at least some of you will look back on your behavior during this period and be embarrassed, even horrified. But hopefully, you will look at your younger selves with compassion and understanding. It’s not your fault. You’re young. It’s the fault of people who know better but don’t give a rat’s ass. If you are very lucky and very diligent, in time you will come to understand why that is, why you are being used, and how that happens. Hell, Ya might even become as smart and wise as you think you are now.
Ahhh…what goes around – always comes back around – right, my friends.
Seems that our ‘friendly’, neighborhood left-wing commie pal, David Hogg is pissing and moaning now that his school’s new policy of making students use only clear backpacks after spring break infringes on his “First Amendment rights.”
Grabien News reported:
Hogg appeared Friday at a gun control forum with Axios’s Mike Allen, where he launched into varying off-topic political tirades, advocating for far-left Democratic positions.
After attacking American’s Second Amendment rights for over a month, calling the NRA “child murderers,” Hogg complained about having to use clear backpacks at school.
Hogg claimed that the decision by Democratic Broward County officials violated his “First Amendment rights” as he also cited potential embarrassment for students going through “their menstrual cycle” because of their “tampons and stuff.”
Hey…ya reap what ya sow, cupcake. How does it feel to have a Constitutional right stripped from ya?
It seems to me that Davie boy & Co are getting exactly what they were asking for…“common sense gun control laws.”
See, last Wednesday, the superintendent of the DemoRAT-heavy Broward County Public Schools announced a new policy aimed at reducing school violence — and now the little, spoiled imps still ain’t happy.
Supt. Robert W. Runcie, a proponent of radical left-wing gun control measures, announced that students at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School will only be allowed to bring clear backpacks to school after spring break and will be required to wear a new ID badge at all times.
But hey, an argument can be made for the clear backpacks rule. After all, if it’s such a “dumb” rule why do so many sports stadiums have this rule? It either has to be clear or very small, like barely big enough to hold your phone. These kids need a hard lesson in reality. They want something done, but whine when something is done. What a pathetic little bunch of pawns.
“It’s unnecessary, it’s embarrassing for a lot of the students and it makes them feel isolated and separated from the rest of American school culture where they’re having essentially their First Amendment rights infringed upon because they can’t freely wear whatever backpack they want regardless of what it is,” Hogg said.
“What we should have is just more policies that make sure that these students are feeling safe and secure in their schools and not like they’re being fought against like it’s a prison,” he added.
But wait a sec, Davie — so constitutional rights aren’tnegotiable in order to keep people safe? Or it’s just certain ones? I’m confused.
This past Saturday, you and thousands of your radical ilk, were lining up in the streets for the March for Our Lives, an event dedicated to anti-gun hysteria, a hysteria that has been whipped up in part by both yourself and Everytown for Gun Safety, an astro-turfed group started by Michael Bloomberg that believes the Second Amendment to be roughly as important as a discarded tampon.
I must also ask ya, Davie…you don’t really need that backpack, do ya, boy? After all, what kind of American needs a backpack made out of opaque material? Your need to express yourself surely doesn’t override my need for safety.
Oh, and by the way, unlike the kind of gun laws Everytown thinks it can push, invasive school safety measures — metal detectors, drug-sniffing dogs, school uniforms and public school restrictions like those — have all sailed through the courts! Check for yourself, snowflake.
You see, my friends, just like his alt-left, commie, adult handlers – Hogg is only interested in constitutional protections when it affects his backpack. When it’s other people’s stuff, he’s not so interested. Well, that’s not how the Constitution works. It was put together to protect the rights of every American, including rights that may be temporally unpopular.
Hogg & Co are too young and immature to see that they’re being used as pawns by progressives in the school and MSM who want to create a socialist workers paradise, but understand that they must disarm the citizenry to accomplish this. Freedom and socialism cannot exist at the same time…PERIOD! Never has and never will! The more socialist policies we get in America, the more freedom we lose, as Obama Care proved. But to go whole Hogg (snicker), we must be disarmed so we cannot fight back. Young Master Hogg doesn’t understand the ramifications behind what he preaches, he thinks it makes him sound intelligent because the smug progressives around him told him it did.
Also, backpacks are for books and school supplies. I think young ladies carry purses for private things. I don’t believe they are going to take a back pack into a stall in the rest room to take care of themselves.
Lastly, who the hell needs a backpack in school anyway? Growing up in the late 50s and 60s, up through high school, we carried our books, binders, etc, under our arm and we had everything we needed for class. The only container we ever brought from home was a lunch box, and most kids (like myself and my siblings), just brown-bagged it. We had no choice but to tote our textbooks and notebooks around campus with our hands. Some of us tied a belt around them or (the girls), clutched them to their chest as they walked. Either way, lugging all our books and binders was little more than a glorified juggling act.
These pussified punks of today don’t carry a fraction of the books in their backpacks that we had to carry in our hands… hell, maybe we should stop allowing backpacks all together, huh!
Anyway, careful what ya wish for, Davie boy…ya just might get it!
Keep your eyes on Kyle Kashuv here…he’s going places in the future!
Friends, let me start by saying that Kyle Kashuv is the leftists’ worst nightmare. With more and more young people like Kyle, there is still hope for this country long after those of my vintage are dead and gone.
And, may God help this country if radical, alt-left socialists like illiterate David Hogg and his ‘boy-toy’, Emma “Baldy” González, along with their ilk, gain any modicum of power.
I would have at least a minor respect for the left, especially the MSM, if they gave Kyle and other young students like him equal time. But the left, like the true socialists they are, attempt to quell any and all opposing views.
This past Saturday, thousands of young, alt-left radicals (err, I mean ‘students’), flooded the streets in Washington, DC to (supposedly) protest school safety, yet have shut out voices — like Kyle’s and Andrew Pollack’s — looking to protect the 2nd Amendment. Recall that Andrew Pollack’s daughter was killed in the mass shooting at Parkland, and Kyle is also a student there. They both have a message that the MSM – for some reason – doesn’t seem to want to push.
The ‘Nazi’ youth rally this week-end had nothing to do with “school safety,” but was simply just another anti-Trump; anti-conservo; anti-2nd Amendment; anti-anything American demonstration (no doubt funded by the likes of leftist BILLIONAIRE George Soros).
You see Kyle Kashuv has distanced himself from classmates like Hogg and called out what he considered to be the hypocrisy of their comments. He’s specifically expressed outrage at Hogg for reportedly hanging up on President Trump during a phone conversation about gun control. He’s also sternly against the group’s main goal: limiting access to AR-15s.
While his radical classmates were calling out the NRA — and companies that profit from it — on Twitter, Kashuv went on Fox News to say that he disagreed with their approach. “People have been pegging the NRA as a scary boogeyman that truly doesn’t care about the kids…and I don’t think that’s true at all,” Kashuv said. “The NRA represents 5 million-plus American citizens — gun-law-abiding citizens — and simply painting the NRA as the issue here, it kind of detracts from the actual changes that could be made…targeting the proper aspects like mental health reform and making sure that we deliver all the information to the proper agencies referring to background checks.”
Kyle (unlike Hogg and ‘Baldy’), has also met with dozens of lawmakers about gun reform in Washington, D.C. — most of them on the right, but Dems as well. This list includes Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), and Vice President Mike Pence (who is in Kashuv’s current Twitter profile photo). He’s shared a lot from the meetings on his Twitter page, which has more than 100,000 followers.
Kyle Kashuv with various lawmakers in D.C.
Kyle, meeting personally with Sen. Rubio
And, make no mistake about it, Kyle (unlike his imbecilic classmates, Hoggie and Baldy), is highly intelligent. I would go as far as to say definitely Mensa material. I guarantee he will get several academic scholarship offers at universities like Harvard, Yale, MIT, Duke, etc. Unlike Hoggie who was rejected by several public colleges.
While Hoggie was whining about his college rejections and stuffing his face with chocolate chip muffins, Kyle (an honor student) was plowing through a pile of homework in hopes of graduating top of his class. Strange, but it would seem many left-wing intellects would commend Kyle for his academic excellence, instead of denigrating him for it and placing Hogg and ‘Baldy’ on a pedestal. Anyway, Kyle’s parents emigrated from Israel in the 1990s, and raised Kyle in Parkland.
Kyle demonstrated his intellect, as well as his superb debate skills when he appeared on “Good Morning Britain” to discuss guns, gun control, and the STOP School Violence Act of 2018.
There were four major exchanges throughout Kashuv’s segment with libtard hosts Piers Morgan and Susanna Reid that stood out.
First, they spoke about arming teachers:
REID:You actually support, don’t you, President Trump’s suggestion that teachers should be armed. Do you think that might have stopped what happened a month ago?
KASHUV:The thing with teachers is this — we don’t have the funding even for, like, teachers themselves…and we need to find a way to protect our schools. Not every school can get three armed officers, and we need to find a middle ground because we don’t have the funding for three armed officers outside every school — and patrolling each school. And the only logical solution is having teachers. What we want to do, what the Marshal Plan proposes is that it gives schools the opportunity — the superintendent, and the county, and the teacher all have to voluntarily say “yes” to this. No one is forcing anyone to do so. A kindergarten teacher who can’t handle recess with her kids won’t be the one having a gun; it will be ex-military, someone who’s been around guns their entire life.
Next, Morgan challenged Kashuv over raising the age limit on firearm purchases:
MORGAN:Donald Trump, in the wake of the shooting, he came out with a lot of what I thought were very promising statements about wanting to increase the age limit, for example, for buying guns in Florida and around America from 18 to 21; banning bump stocks, which were used to convert semi-automatic guns into virtual automatic guns, and so on. But he’s reined back on all this, and this week, really the only thing that he put forward was extended background checks — which is fine — but it doesn’t, in my view, go nearly far enough. Do you not feel it’s weird that in Florida for example you can’t buy a beer until you are 21, but you can buy an AR-15 gun?
KASHUV:I don’t think that’s the argument. That’s not the argument at all. Why shouldn’t a mother — a single mother of two be able to defend her children in her own home — who’s 20? Why can’t a 20-year-old single mother be able to defend her children? Raising the age from 18 to 21 won’t solve the problem. It simply like a reactionary statement to what happened in Parkland.
Next, Morgan and Kashuv discussed gun deaths in the U.K. versus the United States, and Kashuv had to redirect Morgan, who went off topic – this is really where Kyle took Morgan to task:
MORGAN:Do you understand though, in a country like Britain, where we don’t really have any guns, we look at this and we say, “Why wouldn’t you want to do at least something?”
KASHUV:That’s not true. When you talk about guns, although the mass murders went down, murders went up.
MORGAN:That’s simply not true, Kyle, and this is a problem. The gun lobby in America would love people to believe that. Here’s the reality — every year in Britain, 32 people die from gun-related deaths. Every day in America, that number is 85. America has more gun deaths per year…America has more gun deaths than the next 22 richest countries in the world combined. And at some point, surely, there has to be some form of tighter regulation to just try and stop these incessant shootings.
KASHUV:Let me tell you something, most of the deaths that you see are from suicides. The next majority, all right, is gang-related violence. And stripping away the rights of individuals who are law abiding citizens won’t solve the problem. And let’s say we look at assault rifles. 3% of all gun deaths are with assault rifles; 68% of those are suicides. So saying that we’re going to ban all semi-automatic rifles will not solve the problem. We have to look a gang-related violence [because] that’s where most of the numbers come from.
My friends, Kyle is correct. According to government data from the U.K.’s Office of National Statistics, following the Firearms Act in 1997, homicides increased.
Looking at FBI statistics, from 2010 – 2014, there were 63,061 gun homicides. Of those, 1,530 were committed using a “rifle.” That’s an average of 2.4%. Handguns, however, were used in 47.7% of gun homicides during the same period.
According to FiveThirtyEight, “two-thirds of the more than 33,000 gun deaths that take place in the U.S. every year are suicides.”
Lastly, when Morgan brought up Sandy Hook, Kashuv noted that Parkland isn’t comparable, as the abject failure of the authorities was a major factor:
MORGAN:So, in 2012 [at] Sandy Hook, a deranged young man took an AR-15, and shot up a school, and killed 20 children. Absolutely nothing was done to stop further deranged young men doing the exactly the same thing, and indeed, in Florida, in your school, just a month ago, another one did exactly the same thing with the same firearm.
KASHUV:…it’s very different what happened at our school. What happened at our school is that there were 78 reports to Broward Sheriff’s Office, and nothing was done. Two tips to the FBI. Had this been reported to the proper bureau, he wouldn’t have been able to buy a gun with his past prior record. [There’s] not a proper recording of evidence.
MORGAN:But Kyle, that doesn’t change the fact that he still took a semi-automatic rifle that he bought legally along with six other guns —
KASHUV:What do you suggest?
MORGAN:Here’s what I suggest. I suggest that America suddenly gets very serious about guns, right? It’s more difficult to actually get a car legally with all the regulations than it is to buy a semi-automatic rifle in many states. It’s more difficult to buy a pet dog in some states in America than it is to buy a semi-automatic rifle.
KASHUV:I’ll tell you why, because owning a gun is a right, not a privilege, as shown by the Second Amendment.
MORGAN:I understand that, but my 20-year-old son was rejected from buying a non-alcoholic beer in California because it had 0.001% alcohol, and yet in Arizona, a week later, an 8-year-old girl was allowed to fire an Uzi machine gun at a gun range, and she killed her instructor by mistake. That is legal. Now again, I’ll say to you —
KASHUV:That’s a false — what you’re saying here isn’t really fair to the argument. Simple mistakes that happen because they’re not [properly] supervised doesn’t represent America and the gun culture in America.
MORGAN:So you think it’s okay for 8-year-old kids to fire Uzi machine guns with real bullets?
KASHUV:I don’t think that specific case is even relevant to the [discussion point] we’re talking about right now. We’re talking about making sure school shootings [won’t] ever happen again.
Friends, I believe it’s fair to say that Kyle held his own against Morgan in the debate about guns.
And…speaking of debates, this past Saturday, Kyle also challenged David Hogg to a debate over the subject of gun control.
Kyle tweeted: “Hey @davidhogg111 you seem really fired up about gun control. Lets debate, one Parkland student to another. I’m in DC right now.”
Kyle even sent Hogg a direct message to make sure that he saw his challenge, but has not yet received a response. Dave Rubin, host of “The Rubin Report,” had signaled on Friday evening that he would be willing to host a civil gun control debate between Kashuv and Hogg.
Rubin wrote: “Happy to do that. I’ll donate all proceeds and see how else I can raise funds. Kyle Kashuv has agreed, hope you will too, David Hogg.”
Well, Mr. Rubin and Kyle…don’t look for Hoggie to accept your debate challenge. Hell, Hoggie would be like a fish outta water in a debate with Kyle, and without some left-wing news pundit speaking for Hogg via a hidden earpiece. HA! After being publicly thrashed in a debate by Kyle, punkie Hogg would need to retreat to his libtard ‘safe space’ and chocolate chip muffins!
Kyle had previously called out Hogg on Fox News Tuesday for bragging about hanging up on the White House.
Host Martha MacCallum played a clip of Hogg talking about how he hung up on the White House on HBO’s “Real Time with Bill Maher.”
“I actually hung up on the White House the other day,” Hogg said. “They actually called me the day before the listening session and asked if we were going to come, and I said I’m not coming because we expect President Trump to come to the CNN town hall, and I ended on this message with them, I said–we don’t need to listen to President Trump. President Trump needs to listen to the screams of the children and the screams of this nation.”
MacCallum asked, “What do you think about that, Kyle?”
“You know, I’m really trying to control my anger at what he said,” Kyle said. “Because, you know, the president calls you and then shows he wants to make a change, and you’re talking about bipartisan change and the one man who controls–who leads our nation, you know, comes to you and is like, look, let’s do something, let’s make it happen. And then you hang up on him and then you brag about it on national television? It’s extremely counterproductive.”
Of course, neither Hogg or ‘Baldy’ have reached out to Kyle about this debate – and – doubt they ever will. I have yet to hear the left put the blame on where it needs to be put – on the FBI and the Broward ‘Coward’ Sheriff’s Office – along with the shooter himself…Nikolas Cruz! They’d rather blame Trump, the NRA and it’s law-abiding members, as well as all other law-abiding citizens…and of course, those ‘bad’ guns themselves.
Kyle said the first lady was the most amazing person he had ever met. At least until he met the prez.
Kyle, the prez, and the First Lady
“She is by far the most caring, maternal, and just amazing person I have met at the time being,” he said. “They’re both amazing…She was so empathetic and caring – she really cares for the youth – and she views bullying and emotional trauma as a major issue.”
Kyle showed the first lady his app, which she then tweeted about, wishing him success and thanking him for visiting the White House.
“Heartened to see children affected by tragedy using their voices to try and create change,” she wrote. “His message of unity inspires us all!”
Indeed, Madam First Lady.
And friends, I’m sure we’ll be seeing Kyle Kashuv in the political arena in the future…maybe even in the Oval Office as ‘President Kashuv’!
Meanwhile, the snowflakes can have their radical pussy ‘king’.
“Why won’t anyone listen to me, me, me, me??…Why isn’t anyone having me on every 6:00 news show anymore??…I wanna be important again!!…It’s all about me, me, me, me!!”
My friends, I gotta give credit to Hogg boy and his ‘shemale’ sidekick, ‘Baldy’ for being creative with ‘new and improved’ fake news stories.
Recall when Hogg said a while back that he would not go back to school until the nation wised up and passed gun control….and no one gave a shit? We (sane individuals) just chalked it up to another one of his immature temper tantrums, and went on with our lives.
Well, now it seems that he and ‘Baldy’ are whining about the evil NRA “threatening” them. Apparently, these two attention seeking radical punks are starting to miss the limelight and they want everyone to see them on a stage again.
Uhhh, sorry kiddies, y’all are like a tampon. Used by the anti-gun ‘Nazis’ until you were filthy, and now just thrown away and flushed down the proverbial toilet. You nitwits should have learned that before agreeing to be their bitches!
But ya see, Hogg, Baldy, and the rest of their Parkland crew have spent a great deal of time on television lately. They’ve gotten all the attention in the world – oddly enough, they get this while Kyle Kashuv is usually excluded – and they’ve gone to great pains to demonize the NRA and those of us associated with it. They called the NRA “child murderers,” for crying out loud.
Now, let me stop here a minute. For those who may not be aware of who Kyle Kashuv is, well, he’s one of the few young American patriots who supports the 2nd Amendment. He has only appeared on Fox News to support gun rights, but the other despot ‘state-run’ networks have refused to allow him equal time. Gee..why does that not surprise me?
CNN’s Brooke Baldwin canceled her scheduled interview with him a couple days ago, and while many of the left-wing controlled students from the anti-gun debate were included on it’s cover, TIME magazine left out pro-2nd Amendment students from the other side of the debate, specifically Kyle Kashuv.
But, that’s the way socialism works, my friends. That’s the kind of country these new-age Nazis are planning for the US of A!
Anyway, with that said, Hogg and Baldy told CBS News that the NRA is “basically” threatening them – to wit:
“There’s always been people who are going to want to harm us,” Gonzalez said. “I’m not going to pretend that this like opened my eyes to a cruel and harmful world…When it comes right down to it, we already knew that this world was going to be tough. So getting death threats like that doesn’t really faze us.”
Asked about the NRA’s response to their movement, Hogg responded: “I think it just goes to prove what exactly they are. I don’t think NRA members are bad people at all. I think they’re responsible gun owners that want to become politically active and make their voices heard in this democracy, and I think that’s an excellent thing.”
“I think the problem comes in when it’s people at the top of this organization that don’t listen to their constituents and continue to scare people into buying more guns, creating more violence, so they can scare more people and sell more guns,” he continued. “The people at the top of the NRA are no longer working for the people that are in their organization. They’re working on behalf of the gun lobby.”
Both Hogg and Gonzalez say the NRA has reached out to them, but not in a positive way.
“The way that they’ve been reaching out to us is basically threatening us,” Hogg said.
Of course, he doesn’t elaborate on how the NRA allegedly “threatened” him, nor does the left-wing interviewer push him to fully explain the “threat.”
He just said that he doesn’t think “NRA members are bad people at all. I think they’re responsible gun owners…” Then, out the other side of his ignorant yap, he says the NRA is “scaring” people into buying more guns, “creating more violence.”
I challenge you, Baldy, or any one of your anti-gun ‘Nazis’ to show where any NRA member – past or present, has been shown to “create more violence”! And YES! I, for one, have bought two more guns as a result of your ilk’s planned gun confiscation agenda…I got an AR-15 and a .44 magnum derringer (shown below). As I mentioned in a prior post, I had no intention of buying any more guns (I already own a .40 cal Glock and .12 ga shotgun), but thanks to anti-gun Nazis like y’all, I figured I better get ’em while I still can – and ya can bet your pansy asses I’m gonna be buying more!
My latest two additions to my gun collection…(thanks Hogg and ‘Baldy’)
Anyway, let me start off by saying that the NRA may get a fair bit of revenue from gun companies, but so what? Gun companies and the regular Joe who’s a member want the same thing. We all want the government to stop trying to take away our 2nd Amendment rights. I find it hysterical that an anti-gun ‘Nazi’ like Hogg thinks he knows the hearts and minds of the American gun owner better than actual American gun owners themselves.
As for threats, hey, snowflake, I have no doubt you’ve gotten ’em. I get ’em too from time to time and I have a much lower profile, so yeah, you and Baldy probably do get them. Deal with it, fucktard…it’s called living in the real world, not some snowflake utopia where ya can run to your safe spaces, and be all comfy and secure with your group hugs; crayolas; and sippy cups! Hey…here’s a novel idea for you and Baldy…howz’ bout actually making a positive impact in the world – and for this country – and join the military? Join the Marines…HA!!! I’d kiss your ass in the middle of rush hour traffic on I-95 in downtown Miami if ya can make it through Parris Island!
Anyway, the NRA is “basically threatening” y’all?
Sorry, ‘girlie’, it don’t pass the sniff test.
Look, ya little whiny bitch, maybe it’s the cop in me, but IF the NRA threatened you, I want names and specifics. Not any of this “basically” bullshit! I want to know what was said and by whom. I want actual details.
After all, this is a day and age when people seem to think using the wrong pronoun is “violence,” it’s not hard to imagine something being twisted to resemble a “threat” by the likes of you and Baldy.
Frankly, Hoggie, your credibility is precisely nil with me. I think you’ll do – and say – anything you can to get things your way, and I think the adults around you have no problem manipulating your young ass, so they can get those things too. Hence, lacking specifics, I don’t believe ya for a second! But…I’ll tell ya what. PROVE, with undeniable facts, as I laid out above, that the NRA has threatened you, Baldy, or any of your ilk – and I’ll burn my NRA membership card on a YouTube video and post it here, along with a public apology to y’all…fair enough, snowflake? YOUR MOVE!
PROVE the NRA “threatened” ya, Hoggie…and I’ll burn my NRA card here, and give ya a public apology…
Lastly, my friends, methinks that Hoggie boy may feel slighted due to the fact that the little twerp has been rejected by multiple colleges!
Imagine that, huh? Guess he ain’t the child prodigy many of his leftist supporters think he is, huh? BWAHAHAHAAA…
Seems any moment now, pencil neck Hogg’s 15-minutes will be up and he’ll slowly fade away into that good night. Hell, the MSM is already cutting back on his scripts as they realize “Hey he’s an idiotic kid.”
This little dolt has no clue what he wants. Just a few days ago he was tweeting out this “Can’t we all get along” bullshit. He had tweeted:
“Can we please not debate this as Democrats and Republicans but discuss this as Americans? In the comments if you see someone you dissagree with do not attack each other talk to one another, this applies to me too. WE MUST WORK TOGETHER TO SAVE OUR FUTURE. 12:21 AM – Mar 12, 2018”
Of course, when no one paid attention to the little twink, he resorted to the libtard playbook. Whenever you don’t get your way, do as all libtards do when they don’t get the attention they believe they deserve… Name call.
Hoggie ‘girl’ chose to call Repubs the “Bitch of the NRA,” which is ironic considering he and Baldy are the “Little Bitches of Fake News Media.”
He then took a swim in his pity pool and tweeted about being rejected from a college, yet again:
“Just got rejected from another college but that’s ok we’re already changing the world. Goodnight everyone 11:11 PM – Mar 16, 2018.”
He then tweeted the following:
– “Update: I just ate three chocolate chip muffins I feel somewhat better 11:14 PM – Mar 16, 2018.”
– “Update: I have one more muffin and just got rejected by another school. Oh god what will eat next to cope I might just have to breakout the emergency chocolate bar 12:05 AM – Mar 17, 2018.”
– “Those muffins were incredible I think we all need more muffins in our lives 11:44 PM – Mar 16, 2018.”
– “Thank you for all of your support! After reading many of your comments I think a gap year may be in my future. I may do some internships and work on midterms (the elections not the tests). 8:06 AM – Mar 17, 2018.”
Awww…sniff…sniff…po widdow Davie boy.
SHEESH! I’ll bet this punk has to squat to piss.
But hey, perhaps his inner Bernie Sanders started calling for this little, self-promoting, pissant to get a free ride in whichever Ivy league school he wished to go to, huh?
Yup, let’s not give that free scholarship to a deserving minority person, struggling to break the cycle of his DemoRat-controlled city, and escape their libtard plantations. Let’s give it to this pencil neck white boy, with the rich parents living in a well-to-do area of Florida, right?
I was glad to see, however, that there were a helluva lot of people with brains, who instead of blowing sunshine up his Unicorn ass, set this punk straight about living in the real world.
Some of those tweets were:
– “Go to a college where self promotion is a major. You will ace that course. 10:10 PM – Mar 17, 2018”
– “Complaining about getting rejected by colleges? Lol. Perhaps schools don’t like you taking advantage of their dead classmates? Will you find a way to blame the NRA for this as well? BTW, you need good grades as well. 5:59 PM – Mar 17, 2018″
– “Are you trying to get a pity scholarship from one of your liberal buddies? 1:36 AM – Mar 18, 2018”
– “The french fry station awaits you, if you can manage not to mess that up, too. 6:15 PM – Mar 17, 2018”
– “Welcome to reality, boy. Maybe this will make you feel better. You’ve developed an eating disorder. If you keep eating processed sugar products, you’ll end up obese, with diabetes, high blood pressure and/or heart disease. 11:50 AM – Mar 18, 2018”
My advice to Hoggie and Baldy would be for them to cease their anti-gun rhetoric, and grow some balls and refuse to be controlled by their adult, libtard, socialist handlers. If they want attention, let ’em go to their punk peers and see who can eat the most Tide Pods in 10-minutes.
So, last Wednesday, March 14th, anarchist punks (err, students), across the country, marched out of their classrooms in order to ‘protest’…something.
Presumably, they were protesting violence with guns, which is somewhat like protesting violence with hands, sticks, baseball bats, etc…you know, the kind of things that their ‘ghetto boyz’ use against law-abiding innocents in places like Chi-town, Baltimore, Milwaukee, Detoilet, etc. After all, all of those things are quite horrible, but unless you have some sort of solutions, you’re merely posturing.
Which is, of course, the point.
This walkout was all about posturing, my friends. It’s not about change any more than the Women’s March was about change. Attendees at the Women’s March had a bevy of clashing agendas, none of which materialized into a program for change; the only point of the Women’s March was to label those who didn’t support the march “enemies of women.” Now it’s the ‘Nazi’ Youth March (err, I mean, ‘Children’s March,’) designed toward the same end.
But let me back up a second here, and correct myself. Not all the kids who participated in this left-wing show of anarchy did so voluntarily. There have been many reports, many by the students themselves – who say they felt compelled to walk out by peer pressure, lest they be labeled uncaring about their fellow students – as well as being ostracized and possibly met with physical violence if they didn’t join in. In other words – many were BULLIED AND THREATENED!
The DailyWire reported it received many emails from students who felt pressured. Such as:
– From a 16-year-old high school girl:“I was planning on not participating in the walkout. I do not see the point in leaving class to simply walk outside, stand and talk with peers for 17 minutes, and return to class. The act of walking out of class to ‘protest school violence’ does not seem to have a target audience, even though they may have a news crew, it is doubtful that the students in Florida will see the actions of our school’s walkout as a stand with solidarity. I also support the 2nd Amendment and see this walkout as another opportunity for students and their parents to attack that amendment and my support of gun control…I do see that my refusal to participate may be seen as unsympathetic or cruel. My brother, who is a freshman, is being pressured in class to participate.”
– From a 17-year-old high school student:“tomorrow my school is having a walkout at 10:00 ‘for the 17 students who were killed in the Parkland, Fl shooting.’ The walkout, however, here at my school, is not really about that. It is being promoted by an anti-gun/leftist political agenda that I just don’t and can’t support, especially using the 17 kids that were MY AGE as a platform. I was wondering what you would say to people who want to call me ‘insensitive’ and ‘a terrible person.’”
– From another 17-year-old high school student:“The reason I am emailing is because my school is having a walkout on March 14th. They say in an email that this walkout is to advocate for gun reform but they also say that we are walking to honor the victims of the parkland massacre. I am in favor of walking to honor the victims, but not in favor of promoting gun reform. I feel like I have to choose between going against my political values or looking like a bad person. I need help. What do I do?”
– From another high schooler:“My high school is participating in the walkout on Wednesday, and I am unsure what to do. I am very against gun control and don’t want to protest congress for something they are doing right, if that makes sense. However, I don’t want to be singled out by students as someone who ‘doesn’t care about the students who died.’ Should I participate and conform to avoid humiliation and honor the students or should I remain in class alone? I don’t know if the walkout is more about gun control or honoring the students.”
Then there were students who emailed that they want to do something to counter the propaganda, and who will be ignored by the media:
– From a 16-year-old high schooler:“It is ignoring the fact that most gun violence is against blacks with handguns. Ignoring that fact is by definition racist. A nation-wide walk out for a majority white 1 percent is real white privilege and ignorant of the real problem, most gun violence is against blacks with handguns, not assault weapons, and ignoring that would from its core be racist and ignorant.”
– From a high school senior:“Please let me start by saying that I respect the Left’s position on the walkout tomorrow, but I do not agree with their solution. I have decided to organize my own walk out to push Right wing beliefs on how to stop school violence…Respect other’s opinions and others will respect yours. ‘Here to save lives. Pro-Second amendment.’”
Friends, as I just mentioned here, to suggest that anyone who doesn’t support gun control doesn’t support children — even pro-Second Amendment children themselves, who choose not to support the agenda — is vile bullying.
As someone else mentioned in a forum, if these kids really are concerned with saving lives, them where are the protests for all the innocents’ violently murdered every day in places like Chi-town and others? Where are the protests for innocent infants being literally dismembered and murdered while still in the womb? And, may I add, it is a fact that these Chi-town, etc and abortion murders are all happening in mostly black areas!
Now, this 17-minute protest organized by Empower, the youth branch of the Women’s March, began at 10 a.m. last Wednesday.
It’s interesting however, that these leftists and their partners-in-crime in the MSM will never tell y’all the truth about this Empower Org. So, allow me to humbly educate y’all.
Empower, as I mentioned, is the official youth wing of the Women’s March, it is the primary organizer for the #Enough National School Walkout (also being promoted as #NationalWalkoutDay on Twitter). On their website’s FAQ for the event, Empower explained their reasons for setting up the walkout:
“We are living in an age where young people like us do not feel safe in our schools. This issue is personal for all of us, especially for those of us who are survivors of gun violence. We are walking out for ALL people who have experienced gun violence, including systemic forms of gun violence that disproportionately impact teens in Black and Brown communities. It is important that when we refer to gun violence, we do not overlook the impact of police brutality and militarized policing, or see police in schools as a solution. We also recognize the United States has exported gun violence through imperialist foreign policy to destabilize other nations. We raise our voices for action against all these forms of gun violence.”
Read it carefully, friends. It reeks of Nazism, fascism and Bernie Sanders socialism at it’s finest. Notice they had to toss in the “we do not overlook the impact of police brutality and militarized policing, or see police in schools as a solution.” Of course, they don’t. That way, these little Nazi fucks, along with their youth ‘Führer’, David Hogg and his 2nd-in-command, Emma Gonzalez (the baldy lezzie), can control ’em and commit more mayhem on the public school system.
They then go on to spew – and admit – their anti-America rhetoric, by saying; “We also recognize the United States has exported gun violence through imperialist foreign policy to destabilize other nations.”
Now, here is where it gets interesting. In spite of their public façade of being anti-violence, the Women’s March has a troubling history of honoring cop killers and murderers both on social media and at their official events.
Last summer, the Women’s March wished a happy birthday to Assata Shakur on their official Twitter.
For those dumbass ‘Nazi’ youth sheeple of David Hogg’s, et al, who don’t know about this ‘ape’ Assata Shakur, well, ya little twerps, her real name is Joanne Deborah Chesimard, and she is a convicted cop killer and prison escapee currently on the lam in Cuba due to her involvement with the Black Liberation Army (BLA). According to the International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation, the BLA was one of the most violent black power terrorist groups in the United States during its heyday!
In 2013, the FBI put out a million dollar reward for information leading to Shakur’s arrest. She remains on the agency’s infamous “Most Wanted” terrorist list and holds the dubious distinction of being the first woman placed on it.
Gee, what a role model for you little brownshirts of ‘Führer’, David Hogg and ‘Baldy’, huh?
But wait a sec…there’s more. Shakur isn’t the only convicted murderer that the Women’s March thinks is a paragon of virtue for American society. Donna Hylton, who spoke at the original January 21st Women’s March on Washington, participated in the brutal multiple week-long torture-murder of real estate broker Thomas Vigliarole in 1985. Along with three other women and three men, Hylton kidnapped Vigliarole with the intention of trying to make money from ransoming him. (One of Hylton’s accomplices believed that Vigliarole had cheated him out of money on a con scheme that they were jointly running.)
However, instead of leaving it at just kidnapping, the group ended up torturing the 62 year-old man to death. Over a period of 15-20 days, Vigliarole was starved, beaten, burned, crushed, sodomized with a three-foot metal pole, and ultimately suffocated to death before being stuffed in a trunk and left to rot. Hylton and her partners in crime were caught by the police after she personally delivered a ransom note for Vigliarole to one of his friends, who took down a partial license plate of her car.
Hylton only served 25 years in prison for her gruesome crimes.
And y’all still gonna piss and moan about “violence”? FUCK Y’ALL!!
So, before pretending to care about victims of gun violence, maybe the Women’s March should be held to account for its repeated promotion of murderers and violent gun criminals and terrorists first!
Now, what about suspending those who walked out? I say…HELL YEAH! Unless they can show they were bullied into it. And IF, Hogg and Baldy are really students (which I still doubt), they should be EXPELLED!
Look, if the little turds wanna protest – fine. But as I said many times before, let ’em do it on their time…not the school’s, and they do it off school property and in accordance with the law! Try blocking a road I’m driving on and I guarantee ya – you’ll be a permanent ‘road kill’ on the front of my car!
Now, even the ACLU states on it’s website that since the law in virtually all jurisdictions requires students to go to school, schools can typically discipline students for missing class, even if they’re doing so to participate in a protest or otherwise express themselves. But what the school can’t do is discipline students more harshly because they are walking out to express a political view or because school administrators don’t support the views behind the protest. In other words, any disciplinary action for walking out cannot be a response to the content of the protest.
Now, many on the left have cited the 1969 SC case of Mary Beth Tinker, but as always, have twisted its context in the SC’s decision.
You see, the Supreme Court recognized in that 1969 decision upholding the right of Mary Beth Tinker to wear an armband to school in protest of the Vietnam War — (note it was a wearing of an armband, and not a disruptive mass walkout)! Granted, students do not lose their constitutional rights “at the schoolhouse gate.” As the court held in an earlier decision finding that students cannot be obligated to salute the flag, students’ speech rights must be “scrupulously” protected if we are to have any hope of “educating the young for citizenship” and teaching students not to “discount important principles of our government as mere platitudes.”
It went on to state that while what qualifies as “disruptive” will vary by context, courts have typically held that students have the right to wear expressive clothing that doesn’t target fellow students or disrupt class. In addition to Tinker, the ACLU has successfully represented students asserting their rights to wear clothing expressing anti-abortion views.
The ACLU concluded that:
Outside of school, students enjoy essentially the same rights to protest and speak out as anyone else. This means that students are likely to be most protected if they organize, protest, and advocate off campus and outside of school hours.
So, what’s the cure for school violence? Well, Bruce Walker of the American Thinker wrote that there is a perfect cure for the sort of school violence that has dominated the headlines so often over the last decade. Provide parents with the financial incentives and the power to decide how their children will be educated. So if parents chose to send their children to private schools, parochial schools, and other religious schools, the federal government would contribute an amount of money equivalent to what it has been paying public schools for the education of a student.
In case no one noticed, these private schools seem rarely to have the sort of shootings public schools seem incapable of stopping. Private schools can control their students and adopt effective and reasonable policies to make students safe. The private sector always operates more rationally and sensibly than statist institutions, and few of these statist institutions are as pathetically inept as public schools.
Not only have public schools proven incapable of stopping murderers with guns, but public schools are breeding grounds for gang violence, teenage pregnancy, drug abuse, and a depressingly long list of social problems. The real purpose of public schools, which is accomplished quite well, is the indoctrination of leftism mythology and mendacity into the unguarded minds of children. Social engineering, not education, is the mission of public schools, and it has been for many decades.
Mr. Walker concluded with:
As more and more parents opted for homeschooling or private schooling, public school student populations would begin to shrink like drops of water on a hot sidewalk. More and more private schools of different varieties would blossom, providing what leftists always tout as vital but always dismiss in practice: diversity.
This, then, ought to be the relentless message of conservatives: the problem with gun violence in public schools is the public education system itself.
Institutionalized public education is an anachronism and a catastrophe. It breeds social problems and crime. Those who truly care about this ought to recognize the danger of institutionalized public schooling and ought to support the privatization and de-institutionalization of education.
If leftists really care about gun violence in public schools, then they will support this change, but of course, all leftists ever really care about is power.
Lastly, I give kudos to actor James Woods, whose name may as well be synonymous with “Twitter burns.”
Whether it’s Nancy Pelosi, Planned Parenthood’s Cecile Richards, Chelsea Clinton or Colin Kaepernick, the conservo actor and political commentator takes no prisoners.
His latest brilliant schooling over the weekend was directed toward none other than (drum roll, please) — Hitler wannabe David Hogg.
As we’re all aware of by now, li’l ‘Führer’ Hogg quickly became a prominent face of the gun-control movement. He called us NRA members “child murderers,” claimed to hang up the phone on the White House, and even defended the sheriff’s deputies who failed to confront the school shooter.
Of course, the lefties and the MSM embraced him and have used Hogg and the tragedy as a political opportunity (so, what’s new, huh?). Hogg has since made appearances on CNN, MSNBC, CBS and others. He even was featured in an exposé in PEOPLE magazine. Gee…wonder why he hasn’t had the balls to appear on Fox with Sean Hannity. HA! Need we ask?
Anyway, when Hogg and his sis Lauren decided to publish an especially asinine and naive tweet, Woods held them accountable.
In an effort to further push their gun-control cause, the siblings created “arm bands for change” and encouraged others to wear them as well.
“Inspired by the Supreme Court Landmark case Tinker vs Des Moines I’m starting #armbandsforchange. Make your own and wear it to school or work to protest gun violence,” Lauren tweeted.
See the (since deleted) tweet with photos of Hogg and Lauren wearing the bands below:
Woods was quick to point out the pair’s stunning ignorance, namely that the bands bear a stunning resemblance to arm bands from 75 years ago — in Nazi Germany.
“You might have a little trouble getting Jewish Americans to embrace this look. Do you have any shiny jackboots and brown shirts to go with it? Guessing you might’ve skipped history class while you were shilling for the @DNC,” Woods tweeted.
Of course, after a burn like that, his sis Lauren didn’t have much choice but to apologize. She deleted the arm band tweet and tweeted the following:
“I am so sorry if I offended anyone with my former tweet, I had no intention of bringing any bad connotation to what we are trying to do which is using our past as in the Tinker vs Des Moine case to create a better future for us all.”
And, Woods, being the class act he is, commended her for it:
“I commend you for correcting an image that could be mistaken for a hurtful one. We all want a better future. I respect your voice, regardless of any differences we may have. Please just beware of political hacks trying to commandeer your genuine aspirations for a better world.”
Now, if only her bro would apologize.
Friends, ‘Führer’ Hogg and his ilk are perfectly free to have their opinions and express them — that’s what the 1st Amendment is all about – but when they’re held up by the alt-left as the moral voices of our time, someone needs to challenge them when they say ignorant and asinine things — and James Woods is always up to the challenge – as am I.
Seems the lefties’ newest spokespunk, l’il crisis actor Davie Hogg & Co. sure have a strange way of ‘mourning’ for their fellow students.
I mean, with Hoggie and crew continuing to make their debuts on the libo fake news outlets spewing their anti-gun; NRA; Trump, etc bullshit to anyone loony enough to take these radical imps seriously. And, of course…I’m sure little Davie’s bank accounts are growing also.
But hey…he’s learning the libo way of life early, though – never let a good mass shooting go to waste.
Frankly, I’d love to sit down and debate this smart ass little bitch. On ‘neutral’ ground, of course, and with no moderator. Actually, it would be more of a Q&A session – with me asking him some very simple questions that his adult, libtard minions have yet to be able to answer – or they just ignore the questions. So perhaps our little ‘documentary film maker’ here could answer ’em, huh?
Now, one would think that with the stories and explanations that change by the day by all involved, that answers would be forthcoming, right? NOT! Instead, we’re left with only more questions. Rather than answering these questions, opportunists like Hogg & Co. as well as their handlers in the MSM are posturing and preening for political purposes.
Some questions that I, as well as millions of others have are; days after the shooting, CNN hosted a ‘town hall’ meeting. But, rather than a thoughtful – and respectful – discussion regarding causes and potential solutions, it lived up to CNN’s goal of a political rally. Yet CNN claims that its meeting was not political. Really? I mean, jeez..could CNN pour a cup of coffee without it being political?
Did CNN stack the audience and prep participants? After all, CNN does have a history of planting Dems in its town hall meetings. One participant claimed that CNN gave him scripted questions to ask. Plausible? Isn’t CNN the network that supplied Killary with debate questions in advance?
CNN turned their town hall meeting into a Dana Loesch, NRA, and Marco Rubio bashing fest. Yet none of ’em pulled the trigger that day. Why is the shooting their fault?
And, as I mentioned, the anti-gun ‘Nazis’ are blaming plenty of other individuals and groups for the shooting – the NRA, Repubs, and Trump. They were not in the school that day. They did not shoot anyone. Nikolas Cruz did the shooting. Why isn’t he being blamed? Why hasn’t the left mentioned him in their gun confiscation plans?
What about the BSO (Broward Sheriff’s Office) deputies who remained outside or hid behind cars during the shooting? Or cowardly flippant Scott Israel, deflecting blame as skillfully as HUSSEIN Obozo did for eight years? Why is blame being directed at those who had nothing to do with the shooting?
Where is the blame over the Obozo-Holder Justice Dept., paying schools to hide or overlook crime, in an effort to improve arrest and incarceration statistics? As Jack Cashill wrote in American Thinker, ignoring crime doesn’t mean that it didn’t happen. Those chickens always come home to roost, whether Trayvon Martin or Nikolas Cruz.
The NRA contributed $1.1 million to candidates in the 2016 election cycle, according to Opensecrets.org. The left says the “Republican Party is owned by the NRA.” Is that so? One million isn’t that much – unless you believe that the Russians influenced the 2016 election by spending that amount on Twitter and Facebook ads. Is anyone asking about the really big money? And…if the “Republican Party is owned by the NRA,” then logically, the Dem Party is owned by Planned Parenthood!
Fahr LLC, owned by left-wing climate warrior Tom Steyer, contributed $90 million in 2016. The American Federation of Teachers gave $31 million, and the National Education Association contributed $30 million! Check for yourselves, friends. Hell, the NRA are a bunch of cheapskates in comparison. Which groups are really buying influence in Congress?
What has Big Education done for school safety, other than making schools “gun free zones,” turning them into target-rich environments? Not only are they not protecting their students, but they are also leaving their union dues-paying teachers vulnerable in school shootings. Why doesn’t Big Education care about teachers and students?
Why do these shootings almost always happen in “gun free zones”? Would a bank or jewelry store ever declare itself a “gun-free zone”? What about any government building in the country? What about the thousands of gated communities that our well-to-do libtard pals live in – with 24/7/365 armed security – in lily-white neighborhoods? And…I’ll guarantee y’all that ‘Mr’ gun-control activist, Davie Hogg’s retired FBI old man has more than one gun to protect his family – and, they ain’t all 6-shot revolvers, neither! Ya gonna ask daddy to get rid of his guns and AR’s, Davie? Why not? Does this make sense? You’re the quintessential, hypocritical libtard, boy!
Members of Congress bray about the evils of guns and how arming teachers is a bad thing. Yet their workplace is surrounded by armed guards and metal-detectors. Many of them travel with armed escorts. Governors and big-city mayors surround themselves with armed security, at work and at home. Why won’t they protect children with the same zeal?
When elected officials eliminate armed guards from the U.S. or state capitols and declare them “gun-free zones,” they can join the discussion of arming teachers. Why doesn’t CNN or any other MSM outlet ask elected officials to explain this hypocrisy?
Why are conceal-carry teachers a bad idea? Aren’t they similar to air marshals? Have air marshals accidentally shot passengers? Or children who also fly on airplanes? Why do we protect airplanes in a way we won’t protect schools?
Some pilots are armed, not all – just as some teachers or other school employees, not all, could be armed. Are pilots accidentally shooting passengers or each other? They are the last line of defense against another 9-11. Why is there no last line of defense for our children if a shooter gets into a school?
If the NRA had been abolished years ago, would Sandy Hook have been prevented? Would the Parkland shooting not have happened? What about Columbine? Or Aurora? Or the Pulse nightclub? Would Chi-town be murder-free and safe? Eliminating the NRA would have as much effect on murder rates as getting rid of SUVs would have on the climate.
If gun control is such an important issue to Dems, why didn’t they do something when they had the chance? As I also said here before, from 2009 to 2011, they controlled Congress and the White House. Yet they did nothing when they had the opportunity. Why not?
Columbine happened on Bill ‘Slick Willie’ Clinton’s watch; Sandy Hook on HUSSEIN Obozo’s watch. What did they do to stop these national tragedies? Why don’t they share the blame for their inaction? If Obozo could “slow the rise of the oceans,” why couldn’t he end gun violence? Has any reporter asked him? Hell, even Obozo himself said that if “they bring a knife to a fight, we bring a gun!”
If the age for owning a firearm is raised to age 21, should that also be the minimum age for military service? Or an abortion? Or a driver’s license? Or voting? Cars and abortions are dangerous and deadly, too.
How old was James Hodgkinson, the congressional baseball shooter? Or Stephen Paddock, the Las Vegas shooter? Hint: Both were older than 21. How would an age restriction have stopped them?
Why are there armed guards at museums and jewelry stores? At sports stadiums, airports, and concert venues? But not at schools? Are paintings and watches more valuable than children?
How long does the average school shooting last? How long does it take first responders to arrive on the scene? What happens at the school before help arrives – especially if no teachers are armed? Can anyone refute the axiom, “When seconds count, help is minutes away”?
President Trump held his own listening forum, to hear all points of view, unlike CNN’s forum, which was one-sided. The prez had a few notes. Big media were obsessed with that. Don’t TV news anchors and former presidents read from teleprompters? Didn’t the last prez use a teleprompter to speak in a sixth grade classroom?
These are all interesting questions worthy of discussion, particularly in a forum like a CNN town hall with a national audience. Yet that will never happen. Why not? Is this a problem to be solved or simply a political issue to be exploited?
Lots of questions. Few answers. If the left wants a rational discussion of the Second Amendment and school safety, perhaps some of these questions need to be asked and answered. Otherwise, it’s cheap talk and virtue-signaling…while waiting for the next school shooting.
(NOTE:Much of the above post is courtesy of Brian C Joondeph, M.D., MPS is a Denver-based physician and writer.)
ABOVE:David Hogg (on right), and his bald-headed, punk gal(?) pal…err, boy(?) pal on the left
Okay, just as I could have predicted, the loony lefties and their MSM fake news cronies are tripping over themselves trying to put out the ‘meme’ firestorms about crisis actor David Hogg and his select crew of ‘student’ participants. But hey…I gotta give credit where credit is due – they’re doing a pretty good job of it.
Ahhh…but the proverbial embers of doubt about these crisis actors still burn, my friends.
But, for the sake of argument here, let’s assume I concede that this Hogg kid and his baldy gal pal (or whatever the fuck ‘it’ is), are actual students at Marjory Stoneman Douglas HS (though, I’m still not convinced they are, but I’ll give ’em the benefit of the doubt for now), just because he says he is not a “crisis actor” doesn’t mean he’s not being coached and provided a script for these interviews. It’s obvious in the videos and in the pictures that it’s all a show for the cameras and they – as well as their libtard MSM handlers – are taking advantage of this horrific crime.
There’s no way in hell anyone is gonna convince me that Hogg, et al, are not being coached and have been waiting for this big break for a long time. After all, Hogg himself has said that he wants to be a journalist (the MSM reports that mumsie works at CNN…hmmm), and that when they moved here from Calif, they chose MSD high because it had a journalism course for little Davie. Okay, I get it. Funny though, how CNN and others are just promoting the same group of kids and ignoring the rest of the school.
Now, I’ve seen all the lame excuses by their ‘protectors’ in the MSM for these movie kids posing for pictures with big shit-eatin’ grins and smiles on their collective faces right after the shooting. This Hogg kid was filming himself and other kids with their articulated gun control statements while they were on lock down in the school! REALLY? Not to mention, looking at the photos, some of the kids, especially the girls, don’t even look like HS kids, in fact, they look every day of 30-yrs old if ya ask me.
Now, let’s break down some actions as told by Hogg himself.
He admits that he has been very outspoken since the shooting, criticizing the NRA and advocating for gun control legislation.
Hmmm…ok, so if he was that passionate about gun control, etc…where was his voice BEFORE the shooting?
He says he was one of the first students who was interviewed nationally about the horrific event. He told CNN that he hid in a closet during the shooting and pulled out his phone, interviewing people near him about what was happening. “I want to show these people exactly what’s going on when these children are facing bullets flying through classrooms and students are dying trying to get an education,” he said. While he was filming, he said that all he could think was: “Tell the story.”
Notice his words, “these children” in his first sentence. Hmmm…IF he’s really 17, what the fuck is he? A KID…that’s what! Why didn’t he use words like “my fellow students/classmates”?
He then goes on: “If I was going to die, I wanted to die doing what I love, and that’s storytelling. And this is a story that needed to be heard. … At least our echoes, our voices would carry on and possibly make some action.”
So, this sorry POS hears mass murder being committed by a nutso upon students, and he doesn’t consider it as such? Or even as a “tragedy,” “massacre,” “slaughter”, etc…but just “a story…storytelling”?
Now, its interesting – to say the least – that he just ‘happened’ to be “one of the first students” interviewed by CNN (his mommy’s employer).
So, his fellow students are being slaughtered by this nutso, and he calmly decides to interview ’em? When questioned about his being so calm, Hogg says that he never personally encountered the shooter because he was hiding in a closet, so his reaction might be very different from another person who had actually seen the shooter.
Now, I ask y’all…according to Hogg, he and his other classmates did hear the shooting, he said he was in his environmental science class when he heard the first gunshots, and the “bullets flying”, etc, and they then ran in the closet. Most combat hardened vets I know who would have experienced that, would not have been as calm as Hogg! But this 17-yr old kid is cool as a cucumber?
No one can deny that there is bias with Hogg being the first kid interviewed by CNN…as well as subsequent appearances there and on other libo networks. He admits that he and some of his ‘journalist’ friends took a tour of CNN in Atlanta. In a 2013 article posted on “Mom Voyage,” this was written about the CNN tour: “Start with a ride on the world’s longest escalator to the working studios of CNN. Then, from behind the glass, you’ll look into a live newsroom, complete with anchors, reporters, camera people…the works! At the end of the tour, future television stars will certainly appreciate the ability to sit behind an anchor desk and take their turn at reporting the news. It makes for a fun experience and a great photo opp!”
So, we have Hogg (by his own admission), hiding in a closet, calmly interviewing fellow school mates during the attack. There’s no mention of him trying to help others. On the other hand, there was a 15 year old ROTC student who wasn’t hiding in a closet – but put his life on the line to help save his fellow school mates. He dies. And all we see on the news (CNN) is Hogg and his baldy bitch pal and how calm they were while under fire. Ask yourselves, how many times have we heard CNN reporting on real student heroes who actually made a difference in saving people. Hogg and ‘baldy’ are now cashing in popularity that neither deserve!
There were literally hundreds of kids that came out of the school in groups after the shooting. How many of them were interviewed by CNN? And the ones that were interviewed by other ‘fake news’ libo networks (understandably) spoke about the terror, fear and uncertainty they felt. Unlike Hogg and ‘baldy,’ they were not smirking and cool, calm and collected, and went right into talking about gun control, Trump, the NRA, protests, etc. The real students who tried to express what they experienced and felt, were cut short by the libo MSM when interviewed immediately after the tragedy – never to be heard or seen from again by the MSM! WHY? I’ll tell ya – because they didn’t fit the MSM’s anti-gun and anti-Trump/NRA agenda.
When I was in HS, or even now as an adult, if 17 of my colleagues and peers had been blown away by a lunatic, the last thing I would want to do is an interview! But if I did, I sure as hell wouldn’t be inclined to put a political spin on it. I would be asking the question, “WHY did this perpetrator feel compelled to kill these people, my friends?” Blaming Trump (or even Obozo), the NRA, politicians in general, or any other political spin would be the furthest thing from my mind.
Sorry folks, this kid’s CNN interviews, the frequency and timing of the interviews, and always – with the political slant – just doesn’t pass the real ‘traumatized’ student smell test!
If he and baldy are not crisis actors, then they’re at a minimum – libtard, antifa supporting, POS radical left-wing political operatives!